🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, after a divisive legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to submit the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by initially submitting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed local councils to establish a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct decisive public votes alongside the municipal polls, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to keep their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to create different wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The different conditions applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that voted to keep their wards.