🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."